GO TO THE ROOTS
Animal shelters can operate in vastly different ways. Curtis
Taylor ("Say No to No-Kill," 5/17) describes one kind of shelter
when he says that "No-kill shelters … cannot accept all the animals
who are in need of help" and which "direct people with unadoptable,
old, injured or sick animals to facilities that have no choice but
to kill the animals." Indeed, this is how some no-kill shelters
operate.
Fortunately for Mr. Taylor, animal welfare advocates in Lane County
are not calling for the construction of an isolated, underfunded,
overburdened no-kill shelter. They are instead wisely building a
self-sustaining no-kill community philosophy. This is not just
semantics; a no-kill community philosophy is one in which the entire
community takes responsibility for all animals in need, rather than
leaving it to a single agency or shelter. It is a visionary
community that puts proven programs into place. These innovative
programs will help animals today but will also reduce the need for
"animal control and sheltering" services tomorrow.
Sounds too good to be true? See how other communities have already
successfully achieved this goal at www.nokillsolutions.org.
Don't miss reading Diary of A Shelter Director, which demonstrates
how "a simple, firm committment to stop the killing, and the
flexibility to see it through" could be utilized at our local
shelters.
A no-kill community does not develop overnight, and not every animal
will be saved in the beginning. But it is time for a new, effective
paradigm. Would a no-kill shelter save Lane County's animals in
need? No. Will establishing a no-kill community sustainably save
animals now and actually alleviate our long-term problem of unwanted
animals in our future? Absolutely.
Kylie Belachaikovsky, Eugene EW 05/31/07
STARTS WITH PET OWNERS
Thank you for your heartbreaking story (4/26) about euthanizing
pets in Lane County. The responsibility in creating a compassionate
society lies with all of us and should not depend on policies made
by agencies that shelter animals. It begins with anyone considering
getting a new pet.
Do your homework first; know what you are getting into. Kittens and
puppies are very cute but can live for 10-15 years. Do you have what
it takes to give them a loving home for their entire lives? Often
animals need to be rehomed for legitimate reasons — death of owner,
allergies, etc. But all too often animals are relinquished to
shelters for reasons such as a new baby in the house, new furniture,
lack of housebreaking and/or medical issues. All of these situations
have solutions.
There are many compassionate animal care professionals in our area
who are more than willing to offer creative and workable
recommendations to anyone seeking to give up a pet. Don't contribute
to the problem in shelters by giving up your pet without seeking
advice. Don't count on the fact that your pet is very "adoptable" in
assuming it will find a new loving home.
Remember to spay and neuter your pets so they don't add to the
tragedy of overpopulation. If you can, make a contribution to a
local animal welfare organization in memory of Garfield and other
beautiful and loving cats and dogs that were euthanized so that
today you can be part of a more humane Lane County.
Randi E. Golub, CVT, CatNurse
on Call, Eugene EW 05/31/07
NO-KILL SOLUTION
I would like to reply to
the May 17 letter from Curtis Taylor. It is obvious to me that
Curtis does not know what he's talking about. Nathan Winograd's
No-Kill Solution shelters are completely open door, turning no
animal away. No-Kill Solution shelters do euthanize animals that are
sick and suffering or are dangerous. These shelters don't
"warehouse" animals in substandard conditions. See information on
his programs and their success at www.nokillsolutions.com
Reno, after a recent clean sweep of personnel who did not support
the No-Kill Solution, has dramatically reduced the numbers of
animals killed at both the Humane Society and Animal Control. Lane
County needs this No-Kill Solution. Please contact your county
commissioner and Greenhill to urge them to adopt this program for
the sake of the animals that we love and care about.
Bev Jorgensen, Springfield EW 05/31/07
CHANGE IN THINKING
Bravo to Camilla Mortensen for an excellent, well written,
coherent cover story, "The Road to No Kill" (4/26). However, what
she didn't mention is one very important piece of the puzzle: The
paradigm change that's needed to make No Kill work. We can have the
biggest, best organized animal control in the world, but unless the
people that are running it are willing to change the way they think
about animals, it won't work.
Mike Wellington said "We wouldn't be in this profession if our goal
was just to kill animals," but if you kill animals long enough you
become inured to the insanity and suffering of killing. In fact you
have to, to continue the killing. Just like soldiers who must kill
the next person coming over the hill, animal control workers must
believe that they are doing what is right and necessary in order to
continue killing the animals. So when someone comes along and tells
them they don't have to kill anymore, it doesn't compute. They can't
let it be true. Because if it is true that they don't have to kill
the animals, then they are doing something wrong and horrible. So to
keep their sanity, they cannot believe that there is a solution to
killing animals.
It is a very sad and uncomfortable issue to face, but it is true.
Hopefully our shelter workers can come to grips with the facts.
Before now they have had to kill animals, but someone has come up
with a solution to that, and now they don't have to kill animals
anymore.
Molly Sargent, Pleasant Hill EW 05/24/07
NOT TRANSPARENT
Greenhill's website says "At Greenhill, we do not euthanize
adoptable animals. … However, because humane euthanasia of
unadoptable animals does take place here, we refuse to call
ourselves a 'No Kill' shelter."
Greenhill says it has already embraced the main core of the no-kill
solution, which is "no euthanasia of adoptable animals." Why won't
they implement the rest of the program? Does Greenhill know better
than all the other shelters and communities across the country that
have successfully adopted the no-kill solution? It is not rocket
science!
An important part of the no-kill solution is accountability to the
community. One has to ask, why would Greenhill not welcome
transparency? A community's SPCA should be the shining, guiding
light towards the no-kill solution.
I used to be an untiring, loyal supporter and volunteer at
Greenhill. I used to speak highly of their programs, their
dedication and the lengths they went to, to save even the youngest
life no matter what.
Two years ago, Greenhill had a list of over 200 active foster
families. The current number of homes stated on their website is
only 75. That decline speaks for itself.
On another note, I would like to personally thank the staff at LCARA
for making small, positive steps towards the no-kill solution.
Tamara Barnes, Eugene EW 05/17/07
EGO WARS KILL ANIMALS
Camilla Mortensen did an excellent job of summarizing many of
the issues ("No-Kill" cover story, 4/26) revolving around a fierce
battle raging in Lane County involving an effort to protect the
innocent lives of unwanted and abandoned animals in our community.
I have been heavily submerged in this battle to give recognition to
the flawless merits of the "No-Kill Solutions" (www.nokillsolutions.com)
presented by Nathan Winograd last July to a standing room only
audience.
I have seen many things in my life that have repulsed me, but
nothing as ugly as the ego wars that rage throughout this community,
starting from the top — the commissioners — and trickling down to
the most innocent-appearing of animal welfare supporters.
With these battles raging, the only victims are the animals
themselves, and unless and until there is common ground for all to
stand on and people can rise above their own personal issues and dig
deeply into their souls to feel that the need of these animals is
much more important than winning their personal ego wars, the
animals will continue to die at a rate of 10 per day at our local
animal control shelter.
The commissioners (with the strong exception of Bill Fleenor and
Pete Sorenson) can't stop fighting among themselves long enough to
look at what's happening around their own chairs, much less the
community.
I believe this community has enough heart and resources to do away
with the unnecessary killing of adoptable animals at our local
shelter. It should be THAT simple.
Robin Loving, Eugene EW 05/10/07
HELP SAVE THE ANIMALS
We really appreciate the extensive coverage EW gave last week
(4/26) to the local effort to create a no-kill community in Lane
County, utilizing nationally proven strategies at no net cost to the
taxpayers, with the goal of ending the killing of adoptable and
medically/behaviorally treatable companion animals and feral cats in
our Lane County animal shelters.
In order to accomplish this as quickly as possible, we need the
support and volunteer efforts of every caring "can-do" resident in
this community! These are your shelters! Help make them safe for the
animals entering their doors!
The No Kill Community Coalition (NKCC) meets on the second Monday of
each month at 6:30 pm at Harris Hall in the Lane County
Administration/County Court House building, located at the corner of
8th Avenue & Oak Street in Eugene. All people interested in helping
Lane County become a no-kill community are urged to attend! The next
meeting will be Monday, May 14. For more information, check out
www.nokillcommunity.org
Diana Robertson, Co-Chair,
NKCC Steering Committee, EW 05/10/07
SHAPE UP, LCARA
Camilla Mortensen and EW are to be congratulated for
bringing the tragic plight of Lane County's shelter animals into a
much clearer focus (4/26). Our overall community and our public
shelter have shamefully failed what were once wonderful cats and
dogs on a massive scale, and those public officials who are
responsible show few signs that they intend to change course. Tens
of thousands of animals have been killed by LCARA in the past dozen
years. LCARA kills 70 to 74 percent of all cats received. How can
anyone of conscience defend this horrific reality?
Far more people need to make it clear to Lane County government and
to LCARA that they will no longer tolerate our public shelter being
run without humane and progressive written guidelines and programs.
LCARA needs to hear the message loudly and clearly that it is
repugnant for them to be killing adoptable animals and that the
agency must establish a sound, online record system for every single
animal that enters its doors. There should be some sort of
third-party or independent oversight of this policy to ensure that
it is faithfully followed by shelter personnel.
If you care about dogs and cats, please make it clear to the Lane
County Board of Commissioners that you find it highly objectionable
that the animals at LCARA have been relegated to the very lowest
position of importance on Lane County's list of department concerns.
Susan McDonald, Eugene EW 05/10/07
Abandoning animals is a crime
I agree with Sarah Steinkruger's Nov. 25 letter
encouraging people to get their animals spayed and neutered.
I volunteer at Lane County Animal Regulation
Authority, and recently a litter of puppies was brought in that had
been found at a dumpster near a retail establishment. Animal
abandonment is a Class A violation under Lane County code. If
caught, the violators should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of
the law.
Many of us on the No Kill Community Coalition
agree that intake fees discourage low-income people from safely
delivering litters to shelters. The cost of spaying and neutering is
quite prohibitive to those who struggle with their finances.
The nonprofit Willamette Animal Guild can provide
part of a solution to this problem by providing spay and neuter
clinic options for low-income people. This program desperately needs
additional funding. People with a conscience will do the right thing
and spay and neuter their pets. However, there will always be people
who'd rather lay their own problems on other people's doorsteps.
Please open your hearts to the plight of the
homeless and abandoned animals in our community. Visit
www.wagwag.org for details or call (541) 345-3566.
I know if we pull together as a community, we can
help prevent these tragic incidents in the future.
ROBIN LOVING R-G 12/09/2006
Spay-neuter option available
I read with interest Sarah Steinkruger's Nov. 25
letter to the editor titled "Don't dump pets at vet clinics"
regarding litters of kittens who were abandoned recently at a local
veterinary clinic.
She recommends that "People need to spay and
neuter their pets to stop the overpopulation that leads to animal
abandonment." What she may not realize is that the cost of a cat
spay at a veterinarian's office here in Lane County has risen to an
average of $135 each (not including exams, vaccinations, etc.),
which is out of the reach of many low-income families who are
struggling just to pay their rent and utilities each month.
There is a solution to this problem. The
Willamette Animal Guild (WAG), a local nonprofit organization, is
presently fundraising in order to open a low-cost spay/neuter clinic
for low-income pet owners and feral cat caregivers in Lane County.
Every dollar donated to this project brings the clinic a step closer
to reality, and will save unwanted cats and dogs from being born and
then abandoned or killed.
I hope that all caring pet owners, veterinarians
and other animal-related businesses will support this desperately
needed clinic. For more information please check out WAG's Web site
www.wagwag.org or call (541) 345-3566.
DIANA ROBERTSON R-G 12/04/2006
Shelter Animal Resource Alliance
Eugene
Don't dump pets at vet clinics
I would like to clear up a matter that is often
misunderstood.
Some people seem to misinterpret the purpose of a
veterinary clinic. A veterinary clinic is a hospital where people
seek treatment for their animals. It is not an adoption agency. Yet
that is the idea some people have gotten into their heads.
They believe a veterinary clinic is a place where
they can dispose of pets they no longer want. Veterinarians love
animals, so it is their duty to care for every animal. Do people
know how much it costs a veterinary clinic to care for an abandoned
animal? Each animal requires food and cage space that could be used
for patients. Employees are needed to care for the animal. Vaccines
and drugs are often necessary because the animal usually has not
been properly cared for.
Recently three boxes of kittens were dropped off
at a veterinary clinic within three days. Each box was tightly
sealed and set at the front door. Sixteen kittens were found inside.
The clinic became responsible for housing and
finding homes for the kittens. Do people really expect a veterinary
clinic to be able to care for all of these kittens?
There are only so many employees to foster them
and only so much cage space. Who is going to pay for all of this?
People need to stop dumping their problems on
others. People need to spay and neuter their pets to stop the
overpopulation that leads to animal abandonment.
SARAH STEINKRUGER R-G 11/25/2006
|
|